Protect your science

–at any stage

Stop integrity threats before it is too late.

Neural Networks in
Medical Imaging

J. Smith, A. Johnson, M. Williams

Abstract—

1. Introduction

[1]

2. Results

(t(30) = 1.5, p < 0.01)

Fig. 1

Featured In

“Publishers launch joint effort to tackle altered images in research papers”
“State and university partner to award over $1.5 million in funding to University of Colorado innovations”
“Researchers have finally created a tool to spot duplicated images across thousands of papers”
“Giant study finds untrustworthy trials pollute gold-standard medical reviews”

Use Cases

For Publishers

Streamline peer review and ensure publication integrity with our comprehensive suite of tools. Detect potential issues before they reach publication.

For Researchers

Verify your work before submission to ensure it meets the highest standards of integrity. Identify and address potential issues early.

For Institutions

Maintain research standards across your organization and protect your institution's reputation. Monitor and ensure research integrity at scale.

For Reviewers

Streamline your review process with AI-powered tools that help identify potential issues and ensure thorough, consistent evaluations.

Trusted by Leading Organizations

Journal Monitor

Proactive monitoring to safeguard your journal's reputation.

Early-warning signals for your journals
React to changes before they become a problem
Risk scoring based on website, editorial, and bibliometric cues
Designed with triage in mind; understand how you compare to others

Read our blog post

Features

Image duplication

Duplication detection in any image, within the same image or manuscript—or across science. Create your private library of images to compare against.

Statistical inconsistencies

Detect statistical inconsistencies in reporting. Up to 43 % more detectable cases than Statcheck

Missing citations

Identify claims that need a citation or citations that should not be there.

Journal monitoring

Continuously track whether your journal has systematic integrity risks, staying ahead of the curve.

Figure accessibility

Advanced figure accessibility issues detection: low contrast, color-blind violations, and readability issues.

Manipulation and Beautification

Detect inappropriate image beautification and manipulation in western blots and microscopy.

View all features

AI Review

Get a zero-th opinion on your research.

Structured review report with major & minor issues
Transparent replicability prediction
Smart journal recommendations
Automatic guideline checks to avoid desk rejection

Read our blog post

Research

Better science–
backed by science

Explore the research behind our technology

Figure Reuse

Bioscience-scale automated detection of figure element reuse

This study presents an algorithm that detects figure element reuse in a large dataset of 760 thousand open access articles and 2 million figures, robust to various transformations. A panel review estimates that 0.6% of all articles contain fraudulent reuses, with inappropriate reuses occurring 43% across articles, 28% within an article, and 29% within a figure.

Missing Citation

Modeling citation worthiness by using attention-based bidirectional long short-term memory networks and interpretable models

This study develops an automated system using advanced neural networks to pinpoint sentences needing citations. It enhances document quality by identifying citation errors using a comprehensive dataset.

Figure Accessibility

A computational analysis of accessibility, readability, and explainability of figures in open access publications

This study develops computational techniques to assess the accessibility, readability, and explainability of figures in scientific publications. Our analysis reveals that approximately 20.6% of open access publications have issues related to these aspects, with detailed statistics provided for specific problems.

Join the Waitlist