Author Verification
5 checksConfirms identities, affiliations, and publication histories
Catch errors before they're published.One report your team can act on.
Figures, tables, statistics, and references checked, with the evidence behind every flag. For R&D, research-integrity, and publishing teams.
Sign up free
For publishers
www.reviewerzero.ai/app/review/8f3a91c2
SummaryAuthorsFiguresStatsRefsAI25 pages
Issue summary66 checks
6Review
11Suggest
49Clear
- Author verification
- Figure integrity
- Statistical validation
- Reference validation
- Replicability
- Plagiarism
Used by publishers and research institutions.
Featured in
Partners & integrations
Recognition
Checked against the published record.
Each check compares your work with reference data we collect and maintain.
- 35M+
Published figures
Used to find the same image in other papers and on the open web.
Used by Figure Integrity
- 17M+
Published tables
Finds table data that also appears in other papers.
Used by Table Duplication
- 1M+
Peer reviews
Finds review text shared with earlier peer reviews.
Used by Review Quality
- 240M+
Scholarly records
Confirms that each reference exists and matches what is cited.
Used by Reference Validation
- 15,000+
Journals profiled
Bibliometric, editorial-board, author, and institution data behind each journal's risk score.
Used by Journal Monitor
- 23,000+
Authorship-for-sale offers
Offers to buy a place on a paper, taken from paper-mill ads and matched against the literature.
Used by Paper Mill Ad Watch
Twelve dimensions. 65+ checks.
From author identity to peer-review quality, each flag is traced to its source and explained.
Figure Integrity
6 checksDuplicated, altered, or AI-generated images within a paper, with cross-paper matching available
Panel Analysis
3 checksPer-panel integrity and accessibility
Statistical Validation
6 checksRecomputes reported test statistics and p-values for consistency
Reference Validation
15 checksHallucinated references, out-of-context citations, retraction status, and broken links
Citation Worthiness
2 checksClaims in the text that lack adequate citation support
AI Text Detection
3 checksAI-generated text, at the paragraph level
Plagiarism Detection
3 checksText that overlaps with other sources, traced to the source
Replicability Assessment
6 checksEstimates the probability a study's results would replicate
AI Peer Review
8 checksA structured, journal-quality review in minutes
Submission Compliance
4 checksChecks against journal-specific submission requirements
Review Quality
5 checksDepth of peer reviews, AI-written text, and review-mill patterns
Before it leaves the lab. Before you build on it.
The same checks, at four points in R&D work.
Your manuscripts
Before submission
- Recomputes reported statistics and flags results that do not match
- Checks figures and tables for duplicated or altered content
- Flags references that are retracted, can't be found, or don't match their source
- Checks the target journal's submission requirements
The evidence behind it
Before a deal
- Checks the papers behind an asset or a partner's claims
- Finds figures that also appear in other papers or online
- Flags retracted work and statistical errors
- Verifies authors and their publication histories
Partner and CRO data
When results arrive
- Screens blots, micrographs, and other images for duplicated or altered regions
- Finds duplicated values across numeric tables
- Recomputes the statistics in the report
Independent reviewers
When you need experts
- Finds experts on a manuscript's topic, ranked by fit
- Flags co-authorship and other conflicts of interest
- Confirms identities against publication records
www.reviewerzero.ai/app/review/8f3a91c2?tab=figures
Figure 3 · 6 panels
Web presenceFilter tools
Findings
Copies2
- Copy #1
- Copy #2
Web reuse1
AI panels0
Accessibility0
Figures checked panel by panel.
ReviewerZero finds duplicated and altered image regions within a paper and shows exactly which regions match. Matching against the published literature and the open web is available too.
Image duplication
Detects duplicated regions within a figure, including rotated, scaled, flipped, or skewed copies.
Image forensics
Forensic filters (levels, thresholds, edge detection) reveal hidden changes in blots and microscopy.
AI-generated images
Flags panels whose C2PA content credentials mark them as AI-generated.
Web & prior-publication matches
Reverse-image search finds figures that already appear elsewhere on the web or in earlier papers.
Every reference, checked.
Fifteen checks on every reference: whether it exists, whether it is relevant to the paper, and whether it has been retracted. Hallucinated references, a common error in AI-assisted drafts, are flagged with the in-text context.
Hallucination detection
Flags references that can't be found or don't match a published record.
Out-of-context citation detection
Flags references that appear irrelevant to the manuscript's topic, methods, or claims.
Retraction status
Flags references to retracted work.
Broken & restricted links
Checks that every cited link resolves and is accessible.
www.reviewerzero.ai/app/review/8f3a91c2?tab=references
All58Hallucinated1Out of context3Retracted1Broken URLs0Restricted0
Showing 58 of 58 references
- Hallucinated referenceCitation context
- Out-of-context citationCitation context
- RetractedCitation context
Reported statistics, recomputed.
ReviewerZero recomputes reported tests from the numbers in the paper, shows the math, and flags results that don't match.
Needs reviewReported p 0.09 → computed 0.013 · F-test
www.reviewerzero.ai/app/review/8f3a91c2?tab=statistics
www.reviewerzero.ai/app/journal-monitor
Publisher portfolio
8 journals monitored
62.8k
Articles
1,533
Flagged
24.4/1k
Problem rate
4 / 8
At risk
JournalFlaggedRisk
- Cellular Imaging ReportsCell biology412High
- Pharmacological InterventionPharmacology337High
- Oncology AdvancesOncology253Elevated
- Materials Science FrontiersMaterials120Moderate
- Geosciences ReviewGeoscience57Low
Contributing factors
- Image integrity+14%
- Author network+11%
- Text & stats+8%
Know which journals carry integrity risk.
Journal Monitor scores integrity risk for each journal, so editorial teams can focus on the titles that need attention and R&D teams can vet the journals they publish in and cite. The feature is in early access.
- Per-journal integrity risk scoring
- Flagged-article and problem rates across a portfolio
- Editorial-board, author, and institution signals behind each score
- Early signals before issues become public
A structured peer-review report, in minutes.
A summary and prioritized issues, written for editors, reviewers, and internal review teams.
- Summary and prioritized issues (critical, suggestion, low)
- Replicability prediction (optional)
- Journal-fit recommendations (optional)
- Submission-guideline checks (with a target venue)
www.reviewerzero.ai/app/review/8f3a91c2?tab=peer-review
Major revision
3 critical7 suggestions51 passed
Summary
Issues
AllNeeds reviewSuggestionLow
How we handle unpublished work.
What happens to your manuscripts, figures, and data after you upload them.
Security and data protectionNot used to train AI models
Your content is not used to train AI models, by us or by the service providers we use to process it.
Deleted after 7 days by default
Uploads in the app are deleted 7 days after upload unless you turn deletion off. Organization admins can require it for every analysis.
Encrypted in transit and at rest
TLS 1.2 or higher in transit and AES‑256 at rest.
You decide who sees results
Reports stay in your workspace until you share them with your team, specific people, or a link.
You choose what runs
Checks that search the web or scholarly databases can be turned off for any analysis, or for a whole organization.
What integrity teams say.
From publication-ethics and editorial teams.
“Manual verification of statistical findings is time-consuming. ReviewerZero's statistics tool is flexible, saving time and explaining its output in an easily digestible manner for research-integrity teams and editors.”
Dr. Gráinne McNamaraPublication Ethics Manager, Karger Publishers“We are thrilled to partner with ReviewerZero AI. ReviewerZero provides key insights on image integrity, statistical accuracy and citation analysis, aligning with our values of openness and transparency.”
Dr. Eileen ClancyManaging Editor, Lifecycle Journal (Center for Open Science)
“ReviewerZero helped us catch problems we would otherwise have missed, in papers that ultimately went on to be rejected. Our editorial offices particularly value the reference checks, which surface hallucinated references and citations that do not support the statements they are attached to. It helps keep our publishers' portfolios clean, and that is exactly what they want.”
Dr. Lisa ClancyResearch Ethics and Integrity Manager, Compuscript
See it on your own manuscripts.
In a 30-minute demo, we run a few of your manuscripts and walk you through every flag. Papers you have already published work too.
Sign up free
For publishers