ReviewerZero
reviewer
zero.ai

Every dimension of integrity.One report your team can act on.

Built for publishers, editors, and research-integrity teams, ReviewerZero runs 65+ checks across 12 dimensions of integrity, from images and statistics to references, replicability, and peer review, and traces every flag back to its source.

See what we check
Minutes
to a full integrity report
Every flag
traced to its source
Explainable
reports your team can defend
www.reviewerzero.ai/app/review/8f3a91c2
SummaryAuthorsFiguresStatsRefsAI25 pages
Issue summary66 checks
6Review
11Suggest
49Clear
  • Author verification
  • Figure integrity
  • Statistical validation
  • Reference validation
  • Replicability
  • Plagiarism

Used across scholarly publishing.

Publishers, societies, and research institutions use ReviewerZero, and the work has been covered by Science, Nature, and The Scientist.

Featured in
Science
Nature
The Scientist
Partners & integrations
STM Integrity Hub
Karger Publishers
CTI Meeting Technology
Lifecycle Journal
Recognition
SSP EPIC Awards, Silver, Integrity Tools 2026
Lab Venture Challenge, Winner 2023

Twelve dimensions. Sixty-five+ checks.

From author identity to peer-review quality, ReviewerZero examines a manuscript across twelve dimensions — 65+ individual checks in all — with every flag traced to its source and explained.

  • Author Verification

    5 checks

    Confirms identities, affiliations, and publication histories

  • Figure Integrity

    6 checks

    Duplicated, manipulated, or AI-generated images within a paper, with cross-paper matching available

  • Panel Analysis

    3 checks

    Per-panel integrity and accessibility

  • Statistical Validation

    6 checks

    Re-computes every reported statistic for consistency

  • Reference Validation

    15 checks

    Hallucinated references, out-of-context citations, retraction status, and broken links

  • Citation Worthiness

    2 checks

    Claims in the text that lack adequate citation support

  • AI Text Detection

    3 checks

    AI-generated text, at the paragraph level

  • Plagiarism Detection

    3 checks

    Copied or near-copied text, traced to its source

  • Replicability Assessment

    6 checks

    Estimates the probability a study's results would replicate

  • AI Peer Review

    8 checks

    A structured, journal-quality review in minutes

  • Submission Compliance

    4 checks

    Checks against journal-specific submission requirements

  • Review Quality

    5 checks

    Review quality, AI content, and review-mill patterns

We recompute every reported statistic.

ReviewerZero re-derives every reported test from the numbers in the text, tables, and figures, shows the math, and surfaces reporting errors and inconsistencies.

Integrity issueReported p 0.09 → computed 0.013 · F-test
How we recompute the stats
www.reviewerzero.ai/app/review/8f3a91c2?tab=statistics
Statistical validation: reported vs. recomputed p-values with explanations

Every reference, checked.

Reference validation is ReviewerZero's deepest dimension, with 15 checks per manuscript. It detects hallucinated references and out-of-context citations, and surfaces the in-text context where each reference is cited.

  • Hallucination detection

    Flags fabricated or non-existent references.

  • Out-of-context citation detection

    Flags references that appear irrelevant to the manuscript's topic, methods, or claims.

  • Retraction status

    Flags references to retracted or corrected work.

  • Broken & restricted links

    Checks that every cited link resolves and is accessible.

How we catch hallucinated references
www.reviewerzero.ai/app/review/8f3a91c2?tab=references
All58Hallucinated1Out of context3Retracted1Broken URLs0Restricted0

Showing 58 of 58 references

  • Hallucinated reference
    Citation context
  • Out-of-context citation
    Citation context
  • Retracted
    Citation context
www.reviewerzero.ai/app/journal-monitor

Publisher portfolio

8 journals monitored

38% portfolio risk
62.8k
Articles
1,533
Flagged
24.4/1k
Problem rate
4 / 8
At risk
JournalFlaggedRisk
  • Cellular Imaging Reports
    Cell biology
    412High
  • Pharmacological Intervention
    Pharmacology
    337High
  • Oncology Advances
    Oncology
    253Elevated
  • Materials Science Frontiers
    Materials
    120Moderate
  • Geosciences Review
    Geoscience
    57Low
Contributing factors
  • Image integrity+14%
  • Author network+11%
  • Text & stats+8%

Track integrity risk across your portfolio.

Journal Monitor brings portfolio-level integrity risk into a single view, so editorial teams can focus on the titles that need attention. The feature is in early access.

  • Per-journal integrity risk scoring
  • Flagged-article and problem rates across the portfolio
  • Per-title risk comparison across the portfolio
  • Early signals before issues become public
How Journal Monitor works

A structured peer-review report, in minutes.

AI Review produces a summary and prioritized issues, plus optional replicability prediction, journal-fit recommendations, and submission-guideline checks (the last when you set a target venue), in a format your editors and reviewers can act on.

  • Summary and prioritized issues (critical, suggestion, low)
  • Replicability prediction (optional)
  • Journal-fit recommendations (optional)
  • Submission-guideline checks (with a target venue)
Inside the AI review
www.reviewerzero.ai/app/review/8f3a91c2?tab=peer-review
Major revision
3 critical7 suggestions51 passed

Summary

Issues

AllNeeds reviewSuggestionLow

What integrity teams say.

Publication-ethics managers and editors use ReviewerZero to triage integrity signals.

  • “Manual verification of statistical findings is time-consuming. ReviewerZero's statistics tool is flexible, saving time and explaining its output in an easily digestible manner for research-integrity teams and editors.”
    Dr. Gráinne McNamara
    Publication Ethics Manager, Karger Publishers
    Karger Publishers
  • “We are thrilled to partner with ReviewerZero AI. ReviewerZero provides key insights on image integrity, statistical accuracy and citation analysis, aligning with our values of openness and transparency.”
    Dr. Eileen Clancy
    Managing Editor, Lifecycle Journal (Center for Open Science)
    Lifecycle Journal

See it on your own manuscripts.

Book a 30-minute demo and we'll run a set of your manuscripts through all 12 dimensions, then show you exactly what we find, and why.

Explore the platform